Scoping evidence mapping

Organize findings and research gaps

Specify whether counts refer to sources, studies, reports or concepts. Multiple category membership can create overlapping counts. Mapping frequency is not evidence of clinical benefit.

Flow diagram

Scoping evidence mappingF1.S1Select mapping dimensionsF1.S2Group the charted sourcesF1.S3Specify maps and summariesF1.S4Identify gaps and limitationsF1.S5Plan reporting and consultationF1.N1Evidence map specificationDimensionCategoriesCounting unitDisplayInterpretationPopulationConceptContextResearch gapsF1.N2Assumptions and rationaleF1.N3Method and protocol evidenceF1.S0 Start flowScoping evidence mappingF1.S999 End flowEnd flow

Steps

Select mapping dimensions

Link dimensions to population, concept, context and stakeholder questions.

Group the charted sources

Define categories, multiple-category membership and unit of counting.

Specify maps and summaries

Plan matrices, distributions and narrative summaries without unsupported effect pooling.

Identify gaps and limitations

Distinguish absence of located evidence from evidence of no effect.

Plan reporting and consultation

Document selection, charting revisions, optional stakeholder input and implications.

Scoping evidence mapping

End flow

Tables and supporting information

Evidence map specification

Evidence map specificationDimensionCategoriesCounting unitDisplayInterpretationPopulationConceptContextResearch gaps

This is a mapping plan, not populated findings.

Assumptions and rationale

Do not automatically add certainty grades or treatment-effect pooling to a scoping review.

Method and protocol evidence

Attach the protocol, methodological sources and versioned software specification supporting these decisions. Record citations and provenance; do not enter participant identifiers.

Sources