Time-series intervention and comparison definition

Specify timing controls and mechanisms

Prespecify the expected intervention mechanism, timing and impact shape. Document concurrent policies and events, and justify any control series. Choosing the interruption date after seeing the outcome can bias interpretation.

Flow diagram

Time-series intervention and comparison definitionF1.S1Specify intervention mechanismF1.S2Define impact timingF1.S3Choose comparison designF1.S4Identify alternative interruptionsF1.S5Freeze periods and impact questionF1.N1Intervention specificationElementDefinitionTimingExpected effectEvidenceInterventionLagAnticipationComparisonseriesConcurrenteventF1.N2Assumptions and rationaleF1.N3Method and protocol evidenceF1.S0 Start flowTime-series intervention andcomparison definitionF1.S999 End flowEnd flow

Steps

Specify intervention mechanism

Define the intervention, implementation dates and expected pathway.

Define impact timing

Prespecify immediate, delayed, gradual or temporary effects and anticipation.

Choose comparison design

Document whether a suitable unaffected control series is available.

Identify alternative interruptions

Record concurrent policies, shocks and measurement changes.

Freeze periods and impact question

Define pre/post periods, unit of analysis and target level or trend changes.

Time-series intervention and comparison definition

End flow

Tables and supporting information

Intervention specification

Intervention specificationElementDefinitionTimingExpected effectEvidenceInterventionLagAnticipationComparisonseriesConcurrentevent

A controlled series is optional and requires suitability evidence.

Assumptions and rationale

A before/after mean comparison alone does not model underlying trends, serial dependence or concurrent changes.

Method and protocol evidence

Attach the protocol, methodological sources and versioned software specification supporting these decisions. Record citations and provenance; do not enter participant identifiers.

Sources