Nonrandomized sample size and confounding
Plan precision adjustment and overlap
Information planning must reflect the proposed estimator, imbalance, clustering and attrition. Increasing sample size narrows random error but does not eliminate selection bias or residual confounding.
Flow diagram
Steps
Define primary contrast
Specify estimand, outcome distribution and intended interpretation.
Identify confounding structure
Select adjustment factors using causal knowledge and assignment mechanisms.
Assess overlap and effective information
Anticipate unequal groups, weighting losses and clustering.
Plan precision or power scenarios
Document effect, variation, attrition and adjustment assumptions.
Plan diagnostics and residual-bias sensitivity
Record balance, support and sensitivity to unmeasured factors.
Nonrandomized sample size and confounding
End flow
Tables and supporting information
Comparative intervention scenarios
Sample-size inputs require evidence; no calculation is automatically performed.
Assumptions and rationale
Power does not remove confounding, and weighting may reduce effective sample size without resolving unsupported comparisons.
Method and protocol evidence
Attach the protocol, methodological sources and versioned software specification supporting these decisions. Record citations and provenance; do not enter participant identifiers.