Target trial emulation

What would a specified treatment-strategy trial estimate, and can available data emulate it?

When to use this project

Use target trial emulation to structure a causal comparison of treatment strategies with observational data. First specify the hypothetical trial, then map each element to what the data can actually support.

How it differs

It is a design framework for observational causal studies, often implemented as a comparative cohort. Explicit eligibility, strategy assignment, time zero and follow-up prevent avoidable design errors, but do not create randomization or eliminate unmeasured confounding.

Decisions before you start

  • Specify eligibility, strategies, assignment, follow-up, outcomes, causal contrast and analysis before data mapping.
  • Align entry and follow-up and document any grace period, repeated eligibility or strategy deviations.
  • Use sequential trials, cloning or weighting only when the chosen strategies and estimand require them.

How the flows work together

Each flow below links to its diagram, steps and tables. Flow order organizes the project; it does not imply that all work is strictly sequential. Data assessment, analysis planning and protocol refinement may inform one another.

1. Emulation overview

Overview · Question through causal effect interpretation

Use this overview to state the purpose and link to detailed decisions. Keep a versioned protocol and decision register, and add evidence references for the rationale.

View flow diagram and step-by-step guide

2. Target trial specification

Design · Define hypothetical trial and estimands

Specify the hypothetical trial before looking for convenient proxies. Separate its assignment mechanism from observed treatment choice, and name the causal contrast rather than assuming every comparison estimates an intention-to-treat effect.

View flow diagram and step-by-step guide

3. Protocol-to-data mapping

Data · Map trial requirements onto sources

Show the target requirement and recorded implementation side by side. Document unavailable variables and deviations, including their likely effects on identification or interpretation. Availability is not validation.

View flow diagram and step-by-step guide

4. Eligibility and strategy assignment

Selection · Align entry strategies and time-zero

Eligibility, assignment and follow-up start must align. Grace periods, repeated eligibility and cloning are optional design choices that need explicit implementations; never require future survival to qualify entry.

View flow diagram and step-by-step guide

5. Exposure and follow-up

Conduct · Track strategy adherence and censoring

Specify initiation versus sustained strategies and handling of deviations. Censoring at treatment change can introduce selection, and adjustment needs measured predictors and support. Preserve competing-event definitions.

View flow diagram and step-by-step guide

6. Adjustment and estimation plan

Statistics · Specify identification and estimation methods

State the identifying assumptions and choose an estimator compatible with baseline or time-varying confounding. Weighting, standardization and related methods require diagnostics and cannot guarantee exchangeability.

View flow diagram and step-by-step guide

7. Sensitivity and feasibility assessment

Statistics · Evaluate deviations and identifying assumptions

Assess support, protocol-to-data deviations, measurement error and residual confounding. Restrict the target question when the available data cannot support it. TARGET reporting guidance does not certify that causal assumptions hold.

View flow diagram and step-by-step guide

Equations and statistical interpretation

These explanations describe notation and assumptions. Flow does not calculate these values.

Causal risk difference

Yᵃ(t) indicates whether an outcome would occur by t under strategy a in the specified target population. The contrast compares risks under the two strategies, not merely observed treatment groups.

Identification requires consistency, exchangeability and positivity, with appropriate interference and censoring assumptions. Sustained strategies may require methods for time-varying confounding affected by prior treatment.

Published example

Dickerman et al. (2019), Avoidable flaws in observational analyses: an application to statins and cancer

Inspect the explicit target-trial design and how alternative analytic choices introduce bias. The example illustrates design discipline; emulation still relies on observational identification assumptions.

This publication illustrates a study design, not an endorsement of every method or a reproduction of its results. Follow its protocol, supplement and update history when studying the example.

Hypothetical scenario

A health system wants to estimate five-year cardiovascular risk under starting a preventive medicine now versus not starting at the same eligible visit.

  1. Emulation overview: Define a feasible strategy contrast and target patient population.
  2. Target trial specification: Write the hypothetical protocol and choose an initiation or sustained-strategy effect.
  3. Protocol-to-data mapping: Map eligibility, prescriptions, outcomes and confounders to recorded information, documenting gaps.
  4. Eligibility and strategy assignment: Align eligibility, strategy classification and follow-up start without conditioning on later survival.
  5. Exposure and follow-up: Specify treatment changes, loss to follow-up and competing events for the chosen estimand.
  6. Adjustment and estimation plan: Select an identification and estimation approach with overlap and model diagnostics.
  7. Sensitivity and feasibility assessment: Assess sensitivity to residual confounding, measurement error and deviations from the target protocol.

Deliver a populated protocol, decision log, data specification, and planned outputs. Enter numerical findings only after analysis and verification. Keep decisions made before seeing results distinguishable from later amendments.

Sources

Source check: 2026-09-17. Record the version of each reporting or appraisal tool used in your actual protocol.

Compare all Observational and RWE studies project types · Open editor in a new tab