Validation study overview — External prediction model validation

Existing model through independent evaluation

Flow diagram

Validation study overviewF1.S1Validation questionF1.S2Identify frozen modelF1.S3Select independent populationF1.S4Map predictors and outcomesF1.S5Generate predictionsF1.S6Assess performanceF1.S7Evaluate updating separatelyF1.S8ReportF1.N1Protocol and decision registerDecisionSpecificationRationaleVersionEvidenceQuestion andscopeEligibilityPermissions andethicsRegistrationapplicabilityAmendmentsF1.N2Protocol and rationale evidenceF1.S0 Start flowValidation study overviewF1.S999 End flowEnd flow

Steps

Validation question

Define the intended population and decision for which an existing model needs evaluation.

Identify frozen model

Obtain the exact frozen model, coefficients or executable version, preprocessing and baseline risk where required.

Select independent population

Select data independent of development and document setting, calendar period, case mix and ascertainment.

Map predictors and outcomes

Map each input and the outcome horizon to the original definition; record unavailable inputs and deviations.

Generate predictions

Generate original-model predictions without refitting and retain reproducible model and data versions.

Assess performance

Assess calibration, discrimination and utility with intervals and appropriate handling of censoring or missing outcomes.

Evaluate updating separately

Preserve the original-model evaluation; any recalibration or revision creates an updated model needing separate validation.

Report

Report independence, mapping, performance and any separately evaluated update using TRIPOD+AI.

Validation study overview

End flow

Tables and supporting information

Protocol and decision register

Protocol and decision registerDecisionSpecificationRationaleVersionEvidenceQuestion andscopeEligibilityPermissions andethicsRegistrationapplicabilityAmendments

Record the protocol, approvals and registration where applicable. Preserve planned decisions and amendments separately from results.

Protocol and rationale evidence

Attach the dated protocol, model or test specification, approvals and amendments. Identify any applicable study registration, registry and identifier explicitly. Diagnostic accuracy and prediction studies are not automatically interventional clinical trials; a disease registry is a data source, not protocol registration.

Sources